His NHL Includes Winnipeg

His NHL Includes Winnipeg
2010 State of the League Address: Turning Point For Manitoban NHL Fans

Before the Stanley Cup final series begins NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman traditionally holds court with the media in his State of the League address. Over the past number of years, Gary Bettman has dropped Winnipeg’s name. So often in fact, that yours truly opined days earlier to several fans that they should ensure they watch or listen to Gary Bettman on May 28, 2010.

Read the address and question & answer session here: http://slapshot.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/29/commissioner-gary-bettmans-state-of-the-n-h-l-news-conference/

What in fact was offered was the usual litany of issues the NHL faces. Of course, Bettman surely knew that the post-address media scrum would be calling for yet another Coyotes’ update. In the surprise of the year, Bettman admitted that should the Coyotes be forced to move, the NHL would move it back to Winnipeg. To further emphasize his point, Bettman publicly named the prospective Winnipeg ownership group as Mark Chipman and David Thomson. Bettman went on to say, “the interest is clear and bona fide, it's gratifying. The process by which they've been engaged with us is as good a process as they could be involved in."

Bettman downplayed any second team for the Greater Toronto Area, while opting for a return to Winnipeg and Quebec City first. "I'd like to try and fix something that I wish might not have happened in the first place," Bettman said, referring to the loss of the Jets and Nordiques respectively. "Not unlike what we did in Minnesota."

The key Bettman quote was that if the City of Glendale failed to agree to cover a substantial portion of the Coyotes’ potential losses for the upcoming season, the NHL had a solid backup plan. "We would have been forced to move it, there has been a lot of speculation about Winnipeg. Winnipeg did make a bonafide offer, but we never concluded a deal."

“Winnipeg did make a bonafide offer.” Let that sink in for a moment . . .

Synomyns for “bona fide” include actual, authentic, authoritative, card-carrying, credible, for real, genuine, good-faith, honest, kosher, legitimate, natural, official, original, pure, real, rightful, straight, true, true to life, unquestionable, valid, veritable, with good faith.

Gary Bettman usually speaks using qualifiers that allows him to later side-step his own words. After two months of getting past the excitement of hearing such statements from the top of the NHL, we have found no way to interpret this statement with blind or implied qualifiers. To suggest that Winnipeg made a bona fide offer means not only that the offer itself was for real, but all the aspects of housing a franchise within the MTS Centre are either no longer roadblocks in the NHL’s mindset or they never were roadblocks in the first place.

In effect, these six words from Gary Bettman has offered the ultimate mythbusting tool on behalf of Winnipeg’s return to the NHL. From 1996 until the MTS Centre opened in November 2004, we dare not even dream that this endorsement take place in fear of opening old wounds. And since 2005’s salary cap and revenue sharing program was ushered in, we dared to dream for such a day. Just a week before the speech, no one could ever predict that the NHL would effectively welcome Winnipeg’s return so publicly on such a large stage before the Finals begin.

On May 28, 2010, Manitoba’s return to the NHL officially changed from “if” to “when”. Only the current owners of the Manitoba Moose, Atlanta Thrashers and Phoenix Coyotes know how long it will be until we hear the Guess Who’s “Back to Bannatyne!” When the news does finally break, Portage and Main will never be the same!

Send us your feedback at The Hangar chatroom or the fan forum.

Chris
President, www.myNHLincludesWinnipeg.com
Over 30,000 unique monthly viewers
~ The Reality May Surprise You! Excite You! ~

PS> We can't wait for Conan's return to late night television almost as much as a certain NHL team's return! Glad to find another Hollywood celebrity to throw their support behind our cause!

Start The Official Countdown!

The OFFside Blog: Start The Official Countdown!
On again, off again saga running out of time

The Arizona Republic reported Tuesday that the the IEH's own PR rep can't even clearly state if they are working on a lease deal or not. We finally see the COG at odds with IEH over whether they have met term obligations or not. Not to mention whether they are even working on a lease deal or not! For almost two years IEH and COG has similarly dithered.

See the article here: http://www.azcentral.com/community/glendale/articles/2010/07/26/20100726phoenix-coyotes-ice-edge-deal-trouble.html

I believe the end is near for IEH.

In 2010, we finally gained an end date for this club: December 31, 2010.

Start the official countdown! 157 days after today (Tuesday July 27th)

And remember that $25 million "deal" allows either party (COG or the NHL) to walk away if things change substantially for either. (See one of the last few clauses of the deal.)

You heard it here for first: Considering they may not have any ownership options left, the COG may very well likely exercise their right to back out of the $25 million lame duck season and allow the NHL to port the team THIS SUMMER realizing that truly the game is over.

So 157 days is the LONGEST we may wait. With September 1st soon approaching, nearly the start of training camp, and being only 36 days away, Winnipeg may indeed still celebrate "Homecoming 2010" long before New Years Eve.

If you can stand the heat in the Arizona desert kitchen, feel free to post your feedback at our forum!

Chris
President, www.myNHLincludesWinnipeg.com
~ The Reality May Surprise You! Excite You! ~

Edit: I correct myself! Stephen Brunt after reading this article first speculated on Team 1040am that COG may balk at the $25 million lame duck season and allow the team to leave this summer.

Why Push Out Coyote Move Date

Leveraging A Better Deal At NHL's Poker Table Not For Faint of Heart

TSN this week broke the news that the NHL and the City of Glendale (COG) have reached a one year operating agreement including the bailout of losses provision, up to $25 million. The Globe & Mail added commentary to the story ( http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/winnipegs-hopes-for-nhl-team-alive-once-again/article1578321/ ) as well as proving a copy of the deal itself found here:

http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00660/Glendaledocs_pdf_660002a.pdf

http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00660/Escrowdocs_pdf_660001a.pdf

Several local supporters have questioned if this deal kills chances for the Coyotes moving to Winnipeg for the fall of 2010. Most suggest that a clause relating to severability does allow the NHL to opt out of this latest agreement should the bailout provision be nixed by the court. This keeps the door slightly open for Winnipeg and 2010.

However, that doesn't address the timing of such a court ruling and the implications to the NHL and the Coyotes.

If the NHL keeps the team in Arizona past its own point of no return and the bailout is ruled invalid by the courts, the NHL has stuck its' neck out from really little to gain. NHL stakeholders would be OFFside to believe that the NHL would so easily and effectively paint itself into a corner of the Arizona desert.

The key question is what happens to this time-sensitive deal should GWI or any citizen decide to take this bailout deal to court? Specifically I refer to any effort to get a court injunction on this deal. In other words, the court may "hold up" bailout payments between the NHL and COG until the case is resolved one way or another. Now effectively the NHL goes into this next season WITHOUT the guarantee they seek.

The NHL is a cunning entity. If such an injunction is made, this deal with the NHL and COG may be off by mutual handshake agreement.

Considering the first payment is called for the 15 to 18th of the month of September, there is time between now and then where an injunction could "eliminate" this agreement under such a scenario.

Why would the NHL not sell the team before that point of no return and ensure that its' Board of Governors come away break-even? Just what does Phoenix offer, after 14 years of failure, with a rink miles out of the questionable/poor market you wish to build upon? Especially if the governments aren't allowed to prop the team up? A future in Glendale seems the least liekly outcome this year and any future one.

In summary, the NHL has no real upside waiting another year . . . unless the NHL is trying to give other cities time to get into the bidding war with TNSE and Winnipeg? This "auction" possibly allows the NHL to sell the team for a $140 million purchase price plus 2 full seasons of losses (up to $20 to $30 million per year) and maybe even tack on a relocation fee. Waiting another year to attract a buyer wanting to hold the team in Arizona isn't the likely reason, as the team has been for sale since 2008 and has received the most "for sale advertizing" exposure beyond any other pro team outside of the Montreal Expos. And we know they are long since gone from Montreal.

Waiting another year only makes sense if the NHL is trying to find leverage against TNSE's Mark Chipman and David Thomson. Maybe in the next few months Quebec City finally announces solid funding for its new rink. Ditto Hartford, Seattle and Hamilton (but only if 'Copps II Arena' sits another 6 miles away from Toronto) assuming that ownership in those locales are ready to make a binding pitch to the NHL.

Maybe by then the TNSE owners have already wrapped up the Atlanta Thrashers for relocation to 300 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba better known as the MTS Centre.

Spout off at the online forum. Vent your frustrations on the long and winding road that this has become!

Chris
President, www.myNHLincludesWinnipeg.com
~ The Reality May Surprise You! Excite You! ~
30,000 Unique Monthly Visitors and Growing

Brinkmanship: Bluff In The Desert May 13, 2010

It was suggested by Astrosnut, a local NHL fan, that "if the minutes from (Glendale City Council's) tuesdays meeting get published today or tomorrow, and Goldwater does step in and take action, would it be resonable for the NHL to throw their hands up and say 'we just cant risk it. We cant risk this getting drawn out in court, and be on the hook for next years losses...we have no choice but to relocate?'"

The implication has the NHL risking another year of losses given that those losses may be bigger than the current season as it could easily become a lame duck season. Needless to say in this situation the courts and not the NHL would be in control of the process just like last summer's tour through the bankruptcy halls of justice.

One would be OFFside to suggest that Gary Bettman is willing to roll the dice or give control from his hand to any other.

Under Astrosnut's scenario, Goldwater becomes the very-willing scapegoat and the NHL, two ownership groups and the City of Glendale all save face and breathe a sigh of relief once the NHL sends the Ex-Jets back in flight to Winnipeg.

This would go exactly according to plan! See here: "Glendale, Goldwater and Gift Law" http://manitobamythbusters.com/blog//blog4.php/2010/03/19/glendale-goldwater-and-gift-law

Outside of the local fans, all parties embrace this result except for Jerry Reinsdorf who wanted his cake, an escape clause, an annual bailout of up to $25 million and Glendale to pay for one-third of that cake too! Talk about a free ride in the desert!

So NHL fans, stay tuned until around June 30th! Because should the NHL declare this impasse up to that date, as Astrosnut illustrates, then surely the NHL turns to TNSE in a hurry. That rush to relocate by the NHL is based on the NHL left holding the bag of annual losses. To be crystal clear, Mark Chipman will only have but one opportunity to take a team off NHL hands. Why? Should Mark Chipman say "No Thanks, Mr. Bettman, too late to take them this season!" Gary Bettman, most likely a vengeful man, will then have to find another owner and city to help bailout the NHL from the predicament it finds itself. Needless to say a Chipman refusal quite likely would be the very last time that under Bettman's watch the NHL will ever think or mention anything about Winnipeg.

As for when the real drop dead date would be, see "Has Time Run Out For The 2010-2011 Winnipeg NHL Season?" here: http://manitobamythbusters.com/blog//blog4.php/2010/01/27/has-time-run-out-for-the-2010-2011-winni

June 30th or July 7th is the week that we reach the point of no return where the second season of league-owned losses are legitimized. A trick of negotiation is to set up artificial dates along the way as a pressure point to get the other party to budge. Any date before this last week of June, seems to fall into this sort of brinkmanship. This is a classic tactic and the City of Glendale is "falling for it". Cue the Goldwater Institute to call "TimeOUT" this weekend or next, which is long after NHL fans like Astrosnut have already called the bluff in the desert!

Chris
President, www.myNHLincludesWinnipeg.com
~ The Reality May Surprise You! Excite You! ~

30,000 Unique Visitors Monthly and Growing

“Here Come Your Winnipeg”. . Hard Lessons April 22, 2010

While we sit anticipating the next surprise in the Phoenix Coyotes off-ice saga, there has been some thought that the Atlanta Thrashers may be the next club looking to jet out of town.

Some media and fans have suggested that if Gary Bettman went to such lengths to fasten the Coyotes to the Arizona desert, we can be assured that he will do likewise to keep the Thrashers in Georgia especially given the size of the city’s television footprint nationally.

Those same NHL stakeholders may be OFFside upon further review. And the potentially nasty lessons found in Atlanta should be well understood by NHL fans in Manitoba who dearly want another home team to support.

Given the size of the Atlanta market, there are many reasons for the NHL to pull out of the stops to ensure the Thrashers never move. Many past news articles and blogs have detailed these so now on to deeper analysis.

The Thrashers are owned by Atlanta Spirit, a group of eight investors from Boston, Washington and a lone one from the local area. Spirit also owns the Philips Arena in which the team plays as well as the NBA Hawks. The WNBA Dream plays out of the arena also, but they are owned by Ron Terwilliger who is not part of the Spirit group.

On the face of it, the situation looks positive in that all revenues made by the rink outside of these sporting events goes back into the same pockets that own the hockey team. While it is true that luxury suite revenues are shared nearly 50/50 with the Hawks, those same suites go for much more since fans get to see NHL, NBA and WNBA games. This singular owner model essentially is the best model for an NHL team to survive and be successful.

Winnipeg’s situation compares nicely. The company known as True North Sports & Entertainment (TNSE), essentially owned by Mark Chipman and David Thomson, own the MTS Centre, the concert promotion business, the AHL Manitoba Moose and hopefully an NHL team soon. This parallels the positive Atlanta model as it does most successful NHL teams.

Past blogs have spoken about the fractured Spirit group trying to buy out one member of the group, Steve Belkin. However, to ensure context is evident, a short background is included. While the remaining members are hockey fans to a certain extent, the truth is that most are NBA first, and potentially second, leaving the Thrashers essentially to Bruce Levenson, the most quoted ownership member on Thrasher matters. It is clear that these owners will have to cut a substantial cheque to rid themselves of the Belkin distraction and his roughly 30% stake overall. Levenson may be the only opposed member of Spirit, should the group decide to pay Belkin with Thrasher sale proceeds. Thus, in one quick alley-oop, the Spirit group rids themselves of Belkin (and potentially Levenson) without having to draw any or as much cash out of their pockets to do so.

There are other benefits through the sale for Spirit to consider. This Thrasher sale also safeguards their beloved Hawks and conveniently opens up another 41 nights for events that actually make money, as opposed to burn it as demonstrated in Thrasher annual losses. Another very important fact is that the Hawks would keep nearly 100% of the luxury suite revenues for themselves where the NBA is clearly the drawing card for local fans and businesses. In effect, the Hawks will make more money with the NHL’s departure and concert promotions has more nights to make even more money for the Spirit conglomerate as a whole. It should be pointed out that the remaining 6 or 7 partners would keep not just 70% of the profits but all 100% with Belkin gone.

With the Thrashers consuming capital each season, the only question for Spirit is why wait any longer? So for an offer of $100 million (as the Lightning alone just sold for) or $140 million (as the NHL paid for the Coyotes), the team could be punted by Spirit as soon as their 7 year non-relocation agreement expires conveniently on September 21, 2010. (Mark your calendars!) So clearly the motive is ripe for the Spirit group to sell the Thrashers for some time now as the Belkin distraction has been in the courts for years already.

It is very conceivable that the Spirit has been quietly shopping the NHL team in that same timeframe. There is evidence to support this theory. In case you may not know, ESPN has linked Winnipeg interests to the Thrashers long before Al Strachan reported virtually the same story in October 2009.

So the Thrasher owners probably want to sell the team.

What about Gary Bettman finding another group wanting to keep the team in Atlanta, if not right in Philips Arena? It has been reported that efforts to find “new investors” are ongoing in Atlanta for over a year. As we have learned with several troubled teams already, this has become NHL-speak for “we’re wanting out”. So with nary an owner to be found, it is possible that what Gary Bettman has done twice for Tampa Bay, he may not be able to do for Atlanta. Surely, if a Jeffrey Vinik-in-waiting was to be had, Spirit may have already pulled the plug on their tenure.

Is it possible that Atlanta is unworkable with any new owner at Philips Arena? Given a cursory look at Thrasher books (or past media reports alone), it is fairly clear that a potential owner would become jaded quickly. Consider the current ownership has access to all these extra revenue streams and yet the Thrashers still turn in losses. If a team were bought to play as a tenant in Philips Arena then an additional rental cost needs to be included into any business plan and several current revenue streams would be deleted from the ledger. If the team is to remain at Phillips Area and unless the Thrashers’ new owner also becomes a new member of Spirit to gain access to rink-related revenues outside of hockey, then the Thrashers are essentially done. That is as clear as the red ink that has flowed almost since day one when Ted Turner and his media empire brought the NHL back to Georgia over a decade ago.

It is entirely possible that the Atlanta Spirit has effectively tied Gary Bettman’s hands in this situation. If Spirit says that the team has to be sold and that they will not really welcome the new owner as their tenant, then there remains little recourse for the NHL, regardless how much Gary Bettman wishes to retain Atlanta in the NHL. If the situation becomes vindictive then Gary Bettman may work things so that any sale of the Thrashers becomes a non-starter with the NHL Board of Governors. On the other side of the puck, the NHL may also welcome a sale if it is to a prospective owner or a market that the NHL covets. Clearly being the richest NHL owner by far, David Thomson and his media empire just might have the NHL and Spirit seeing eye to eye on a potential sale. Thomson as Forbes magazine’s Top 20 richest people in the world brings the NHL potentially much more in media terms than the footprint and number of TV screens lost when the Thrashers leave town. This tradeoff may have already been discussed and informally approved at the NHL Board level. Unconfirmed reports suggest that this was ongoing before the Coyotes when bankrupt.

What becomes an even longer shot to keep the team in Atlanta is for the Thrashers to move to another rink within the city. Philips is by far the best venue for large scale concert promotions. By moving to another rink, the lack of access to all revenues through a tenant-owner scenario still remains. As but one example for the lack of rink options, Gwinnett Center in Duluth, Georgia seats only 13,000 in total, 11,500 for hockey and is presently home of the ECHL Gwinnett Gladiators. Is it reasonable that someone with huge deep pockets and that loves NHL hockey enough would buy or build an arena and buy the Thrashers to keep the team in Georgia? Considering the NHL team becomes essentially a “loss-leader” for a concert promotion business, it is very unlikely due to the team’s financial history. Given the clout of Atlanta Spirit it seems unreasonable to think that they would have trouble finding a new owner by now if the team showed value in the current city. Spirit would have already found that owner to essentially replace Belkin if that value would be clear and large enough.

So with few suitors for the Thrashers and only one decent arena in which to house an NHL team, time patience and money may be in short supply for the NHL’s second attempt in bringing the City of CNN and Coca-Cola onside. Thus, Gary Bettman may choose to live and fight another battle instead.

“Here Come Your Winnipeg” hard lessons for NHL supporters in Manitoba.

By way of the agreement with governments in the building of the MTS Centre, no new rink that seats more than a few thousand can be built within the Greater Winnipeg Area that would receive any sort of government help. Should the TNSE ownership wish to sell their “new” NHL team in the distant future, the new owner would likewise have to buy, not only the team but a large stake in TNSE itself in order to receive access to those non-NHL revenues which have become the lifeblood of the entire league. Given David Asper’s commitments to the CFL Blue Bombers, a “Spirit of Manitoba”-like group of business people potentially without the Asper family may have to assemble to become that new ownership group.

Only this time that group would most likely have to buy both the team and a good portion of the rink via TNSE. To put that challenge into perspective, in 1995, the local business community couldn’t close a deal to buy the team for $67 million. In fairness to them, the team then had no where to play with any reasonable expectation of break-even much less profitability, so to say the will to do so would be an understatement of the century and rightly so without an arena.

With MTS Centre turning into a cash cow for TNSE that excuse won’t hold water unless the group can’t afford both the team and rink as well which is entirely possible. In which case, the Spirit of Manitoba II may disband quickly if access to those non-NHL revenues are deemed critical to success and profitability, which seems most likely.

Since the governments would be legally bound not to build a second rink within Winnipeg, few options remain for a savior or group of saviors in which to operate. Of course, a second rink would be played against the MTS Centre for every musical act coming through town, so both rinks may become financially less stable in that situation, leading to a potential collapse of both arena business models. And after the 1990s, we all know how badly the public will receive any effort on behalf of governments to cover potential team losses. This is a non-starter even given the large tax infusion that a team brings to all three levels of government every year it calls Manitoba home.

As the faces of TNSE, Mark Chipman and David Thomson, are our only practical savior to bring NHL hockey back to Manitoba and they are possibly the only savior to keep the team here once it arrives.

The lesson is simple if the NHL returns to Manitoba. Those memories of 35,000 Save Our Jets supporters at The Forks and our children breaking open their piggybanks to help buy the team, better remain vivid while we support the next NHL team through thick and thin. This NHL support also needs to be generationally galvanized almost akin to a level like national pride, while the rest of the nation watches us in our “second chance”. Otherwise, we may find ourselves like Atlanta, with roughly the same setup, who will lose the NHL twice and there’s nothing any Spirit can do to save the team from leaving. Heaven forbid, but that is a day where our community pride will be the last thing we will be thinking about.

Based on what is already public knowledge, a wise fan programs ticketmaster's number into their cell and a credit card is kept handy. When the big announcement arrives, it will be a fan stampede to grab season tickets bigger and faster than any of the hundreds of concerts that has ever sold out the MTS Centre. Word to the Wise!

If you would like to sound off, blast your comments at our forum!

Chris
President, www.myNHLincludesWinnipeg.com
30,000 Unique Visitors Monthly And Growing

~ The Reality May Surprise You! Excite You! ~

:: Next >>